Wednesday, August 15, 2007

Partitioning India Over Lunch (And Another Fine Mess!)

Today is the 60th Anniversary of India and Pakistan's Independence from the British Rule. Whilst people all over the world celebrate with joy, this news piece shows what happened during the last period of the British Rule and why so many innocent people died and why there are still problems in that region...

Taken from the BBC, Friday, 10 August 2007

Memoirs of a British civil servant never seen in public until now show how much the partition of India was decided by just two men, the BBC's Alastair Lawson reports.

In a quiet village in the northern English county of Yorkshire, Robert Beaumont rifles through his father's archives.

The various and somewhat tatty pieces of paper he unearths are no ordinary collection of paternal memoirs.

They are the thoughts and reflections of his father, Christopher Beaumont, who played a central role in the partition of India in 1947, which resulted in arguably the largest mass migration of peoples the world has ever seen.


Christopher Beaumont was not an admirer of Mountbatten

After the death in 1989 of Mountbatten's Private Secretary, Sir George Abell, Beaumont was probably not exaggerating when he claimed to be the only person left who "knew the truth about partition".

'Bending the border'

It is estimated that around 14.5 million people moved to Pakistan from India or travelled in the opposite direction from Pakistan to India.

In 1947, Beaumont was private secretary to the senior British judge, Sir Cyril Radcliffe, who was chairman of the Indo-Pakistan Boundary Commission.

Radcliffe was responsible for dividing the vast territories of British India into India and Pakistan, separating 400 million people along religious lines.


It was a time of mass migration, uncertainty and bloodshed

The family documents show that Beaumont had a stark assessment of the role played by Britain in the last days of the Raj.

"The viceroy, Mountbatten, must take the blame - though not the sole blame - for the massacres in the Punjab in which between 500,000 to a million men, women and children perished," he writes.

"The handover of power was done too quickly."

The central theme ever present in Beaumont's historic paperwork is that Mountbatten not only bent the rules when it came to partition - he also bent the border in India's favour.

The documents repeatedly allege that Mountbatten put pressure on Radcliffe to alter the boundary in India's favour.

On one occasion, he complains that he was "deftly excluded" from a lunch between the pair in which a substantial tract of Muslim-majority territory - which should have gone to Pakistan - was instead ceded to India.

Beaumont's papers say that the incident brought "grave discredit on both men".

Punjab 'disaster'

But Beaumont - who later in life was a circuit judge in the UK - is most scathing about how partition affected the Punjab, which was split between India and Pakistan.

"The Punjab partition was a disaster," he writes.

"Geography, canals, railways and roads all argued against dismemberment.

"The trouble was that Muslims, Hindus and Sikhs were an integrated population so that it was impossible to make a frontier without widespread dislocation.

"Thousands of people died or were uprooted from their homes in what was in effect a civil war.
"By the end of 1947 there were virtually no Hindus or Sikhs living in west Punjab - now part of Pakistan - and no Muslims in the Indian east.

"The British government and Mountbatten must bear a large part of the blame for this tragedy."

Personality clash

Beaumont goes on to argue that it was "irresponsible" of Lord Mountbatten to insist that Beaumont complete the boundary within a six-week deadline - despite his protests.

On Kashmir, Beaumont argues that it would have been "far more sensible" to have made the flash-point territory a separate country.

According to Beaumont, the "formidably intelligent" Radcliffe "did not get on well" with Mountbatten.

"They could not have been more different," he writes.


British Viceroy Louis Mountbatten read a message from King George VI on the eve of India's independence on the 14th August 1947.

Mountbatten's address (Real Player)

"Mountbatten was very good-looking and had a well-deserved history of personal bravery but, to put it mildly, he had few literary tastes.

"Radcliffe... was very quietly civilised. It was a relationship so like chalk and cheese that Lady Mountbatten had to use all her adroitness to keep conversation between them on an even keel."
Beaumont died in 2002 - his son Robert remembers him with great affection.

"He was also a man of supreme honesty, who spoke out on numerous occasions against the official British version of events surrounding partition without in any way being disloyal to his country," Robert Beaumont recalls.

Thursday, August 09, 2007

U.K. May Seek Extradition Over British Cameraman's Gaza Death

Taken from Haaretz, Israel, 06/08/2007
By Akiva Eldar

Britain may seek the extradition of Israel Defense Forces troops in the shooting death of a British television cameraman in May 2003 in the southern Gaza Strip unless Attorney General Menachem Mazuz reverses his position and carries out a criminal investigation against those suspected of involvement.

In a letter to the family of James Miller, a 34-year-old photojournalist shot and killed in Rafah, Lord Peter Goldsmith, Britain's attorney general, says he wrote Mazuz on June 26 and gave him six weeks to respond. The deadline is on Tuesday.

According to Goldsmith, after an inquest by a coroner, Dr. Andrew Scott Reid, Miller had been unlawfully killed by troops of the Israel Defense Forces.

"Dr. Scott Reid wrote to me and invited me to consider instituting criminal proceedings in the United Kingdom against... members of the Israeli Defence Forces... for an offence of willful killing contrary to section I of the Geneva Conventions Act 1957."

While Goldsmith's letter does not explicitly discuss a possible request for an extradition, British law requires that any suspects be in British custody for charges to be brought up against them.

Israel and Britain have an extradition treaty, and a refusal to extradite military personnel may result in a crisis between the two countries.

Justice Ministry sources confirmed that Goldsmith's letter had been received, but could not say how they would respond in the matter.

According to attorneys for the Miller family, Avigdor Feldman and Michael Sfard, as of last night there had still not been an official Israeli response to the letter from the British attorney general.

Miller was killed while filming a documentary in the southern Gaza town of Rafah, on the border with Egypt. According to Alrahman Abdallah, a freelance journalist who accompanied Miller as his translator, the photographer was shot as he tried to exit a Rafah house while holding a white flag.

A British inquiry, in part based on evidence from the video recording of the incident, showed that Miller was shot in the neck by an IDF patrol.

At the time the IDF expressed its sorrow for Miller's death and said that "the entry of photographers into war zones during exchanges of fire endangers both sides."

However, according to eyewitnesses, there had been calm in the area at the time of the shooting.

Initially, the IDF suggested that Miller had been killed by Palestinians. Ballistic tests carried out on behalf of Miller's family showed that IDF troops killed Miller, and the Military Advocate General ordered an investigation into the killing.

Following a lengthy investigation, it was decided in March 2005 not to press criminal charges against those involved because of insufficient evidence. The commander of the Israeli force that shot and killed Miller faced disciplinary proceedings for illegal use of firearms, but was exonerated.

Miller's family filed a suit against the State of Israel for murder, and in 2006 a British jury ruled the killing a murder.

In his letter to the Miller family, Lord Goldsmith points to the conclusions of an expert analysis of the video of the shooting, which he says was sent to Mazuz. According to the British attorney general, the conclusions of the expert "disproved the [Israeli] suggestion that the shots came from two areas... [and] identified the direction of the shot that killed James as coming from the armoured vehicle."

In Goldsmith's letter, received by Haaretz, the British attorney general writes that the ballistic tests carried out in Israel "could only show that the bullet that killed James did not come from the rifle barrels of the weapons that were examined." In essence, the senior British official is charging Israeli authorities with tampering with evidence, there having "been a significant opportunity for the rifle barrels to have been changed."

Requests to try those responsible and compensate the family - Miller is survived by his wife Sophy and two children - were raised at high-level talks between the two countries, including meetings between Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and his then counterpart, Tony Blair.

According to Feldman, the Israeli government did not treat these requests with the required seriousness and has not considered it necessary to compensate the families.

Israel Relents On Little Girl Struck Down By War

Taken from The Sunday Times, UK, August 5, 2007
By Uzi Mahnaimi

A Palestinian girl paralysed from the neck down when an Israeli missile struck her family’s car has won a court victory over the Israeli army.

Marya Aman, 5, whose plight moved Sunday Times readers to donate £17,000 ($34,000) earlier this year, has been granted the temporary right to remain in Israel to receive life-saving treatment for her injuries.

An interim injunction issued by the Israeli High Court last week blocked plans by Ehud Barak, the Israeli defence minister, to move Marya to the West Bank, depriving her of specialised medical care available only in Israel.

In a letter to Hamdi, Marya’s father, the Israeli defence ministry refused to grant them residency status and demanded that Marya be moved for treatment to Ramallah in the West Bank, far from her family in Gaza.

The next stage of Marya’s battle to stay in Israel will be fought before three High Court judges next month. “I am delighted by the court’s decision,” said Hamdi, 29. “I hope that in the next court session the judges will treat Marya like their own daughter and will take care of her for the rest of her life.”

As Hamdi spoke, Marya giggled from her hospital bed, talking with her friends and oblivious to her victory over the Israeli defence establishment.

She knows nothing of the ministry’s bid to move her out of Israeli care to the West Bank, where medical standards are far lower. She also believes that she will recover – a dream that doctors say will never be fulfilled.

She was paralysed from the neck down by an Israeli missile in Gaza more than a year ago. She had been singing a song and dancing in the white Mitsubishi saloon carrying eight members of her family when it was caught in a missile blast which struck a nearby vehicle driven by militants. She lost her mother, older brother and grandmother while her little brother, uncle and father were all wounded.

Marya’s spine was fractured and both her lungs were punctured. As a result she is now confined to a motorised wheelchair that she operates with a mouth stick.

Her story, first published in The Sunday Times in February, prompted a wave of donations that were sent to her in Jerusalem and will be used for a specially adapted car to allow her to escape her hospital bed. “She will need it for the rest of her life.

I want to thank all the generous readers who have donated money, from the bottom of my heart,” said Hamdi.

Marya also thanked the “good people who are helping me”. Talking over the phone, she said: “I will also buy some presents for my little brother Muaman.”

Marya is in the respiratory ward of Alyn hospital in Jerusalem, the only such facility in the Middle East and essential to her survival. “My life is over,” said Hamdi, who helps to nurse her.

“I’m here for my daughter. To move her to the West Bank, as the defence minister wants, would be a death sentence for her. I checked in Ramallah. There isn’t and there never will be suitable equipment there to keep her alive.”

The hospital has become a de facto prison for Marya, her father and three-year-old Muaman.
Hamdi is confined to the hospital as he takes daily care of Marya, feeding and bathing her and changing her bags and drips. As a Gaza citizen without an Israeli residence permit, he cannot rent a flat near the hospital and is reluctant to leave the premises for fear of deportation.

Muaman was badly traumatised by the missile attack and needs psychiatric treatment. His father cannot afford this and meanwhile he is being comforted by his paralysed sister.

Having received a laptop, Marya spends much of her time operating it with her chin. “I like the computer very much,” she said cheerfully. Marya is studying so she can keep up with her classmates, who she thinks she will soon rejoin at school. She has already mastered Hebrew.

A school was found for her in Jerusalem but she cannot attend it as she and her family have no right to stay. “I only ask the Israelis to treat Marya as they would treat an injured Israeli child. I’m not asking for compensation for what happened,” said Hamdi.

Marya will need £10,000 ($20,000) a month for the rest of her life to provide for round-the-clock nursing, accommodation, a special wheelchair and a customised car. The Israeli government refuses to provide it, agreeing to pay - “as a gesture of goodwill” - only £300 ($600) a month rent for one year.

“She thinks she will recover,” Hamdi said sadly. “We haven’t told her the truth, that she will be confined to her life-support machine for ever.”

Readers wishing to help should send a cheque made out to Marya Aman to: Foreign Desk, The Sunday Times, 1 Pennington Street, London E98 1ST. We will ensure the money reaches her bank account safely

Army Charges IDF Officer Over Wrongful Shooting Of Palestinian

Taken from Haaretz, Israel, 09/08/2007
By Yuval Azoulay and Amos Harel and News Agencies

The Israel Defense Force's military prosecutor has indicted an officer involved in the shooting of a Palestinian civilian in the West Bank last month, the army confirmed Thursday.

The officer, a lieutenant, and five of his men commandeered a local taxi, drove through the town of Dahariya and shot an unarmed Palestinian who aroused their suspicion, according to an initial army investigation.

The officer acted on his own initiative in violation of military orders, and left the wounded man on the ground without treating him, the investigation found.

The Palestinian man was later treated at a local clinic and transferred to an Israeli hospital.

The officer faced six serious charges, including aggravated assault, wrongful imprisonment, and overstepping authority in a manner that endangered lives.

According to the indictment, the officer had been ordered to patrol the outskirts of Dahariya by foot, but instead decided on his own accord to commandeer a Palestinian taxi and conduct an undercover operation in civilian clothing. The indictment also reveals that the officer had instructed his subordinates to keep quiet about the operation, which was never authorized by any of his superiors.

The indictment specifies that the officer and his troops randomly chose a taxi and stopped the driver while threatening him with their guns. The officer ordered his troops to remove the passengers from the vehicle and tie up the driver. The driver was then placed back in the cab, blindfolded, and was held there for the duration of the operation. The driver sustained bruises.

The troops then took note of an 18-year-old civilian approaching the vehicle. According to the indictment, the officer ordered one of the soldiers to "distance" the man from the car with his weapon, knowing that his gun was loaded and cocked, and that the soldier was not trained in operations such as the one they had improvised.

The indictment adds that the soldier then pointed his weapon out the window of the taxi and shot the Palestinian bystander. The bullet hit the left shoulder and exited his body through the chest. He was moderately to seriously wounded by the shot.

The indictment continues that the soldiers then abandoned the vehicle, leaving the driver bound in the back seat.

The soldier who fired the shot has not yet been indicted. Three senior commanders have been reprimanded over the incident, and all of the soldiers involved have been suspended from operational duty.

The affair, sparked by Palestinian reports of the incident, prompted GOC Central Command Gadi Shamni to conduct a rapid probe after which the entire company was barred from taking part in operations.

Shamni has also ordered an investigation into the norms and values in the battalion.

The suspects initially claimed that one of the soldiers had sprained his ankle during a morning patrol in the town and was no longer able to walk. They said the officer had then decided to stop and commandeer a Palestinian taxi.

The soldiers, belonging to the Lavi Battalion of the Kfir Infantry Brigade, went on to claim that after they had tied up the driver and taken control of the vehicle, another Palestinian approached the taxi.

The soldiers decided he was acting suspiciously and one of them fired shots in his direction, wounding him in the neck.

IDF sources said the initial investigation revealed that the soldiers had lied, and that none of them had sprained an ankle.

According to the army investigation, the platoon had decided on its own to carry out an undercover operation, without coordinating the operation with their superiors.

They allegedly removed their uniforms, donned civilian clothing and then commandeered the taxi.

The affair has caused major concerns in the Central Command. Military sources said that harsh steps are expected against the soldiers and officers involved, including perhaps the dismissal of one of them.

Palestinian Shepherds Have Water Tank, Tractor Confiscated

Taken from Haaretz, Israel, 05/08/2007
By Amira Hass

The Civil Administration confiscated a tractor and a water tank belonging to Palestinian shepherds living in the northern Jordan Valley.

This was the only readily available water source for the approximately 60 members of the Basharat and Bani-Oudeh families and their 1,500 heads of sheep and goats.

The Civil Administration is reportedly prepared to return the equipment if its owners agree to leave the area and pay transport costs.

It said the tractor was confiscated during a regular patrol because it was being used "in the commission of the offense of presence in an area declared a closed military zone."
The tractor driver, Ahmed Bani-Oudeh, said he was stopped near the Beka'ot roadblock when he was on his way to fill the tank with water.

After the equipment was confiscated last Sunday, the families have had to buy water at three times the price from nearby water tank owners.

The shepherds have been living for decades in the area of Hadidiya, east of Beka'ot, on lands owned by their home villages of Tamun and Tubas. After the 1967 War, Israel declared large areas in the northern Jordan Valley closed military zones.

Palestinians have been evacuated from these areas four times, including from privately owned lands.

At the end of 2006, the High Court of Justice rejected a request from the residents to rezone their land as residential, even though the settlement of Ro'i is located a kilometer away.

The High Court ordered the Palestinians to move to an area recommended by the Civil Administration in Area B, under Palestinian administrative control, which the residents rejected as unsuitable for farming and grazing.

In April, the Civil Administration destroyed their corrals, and they moved to an area south of Hadidiya.

In May, the residents were warned that their presence in the area would be considered illegal.

Thursday, August 02, 2007

Israel To Grant West Bank Entry To Iraqi Palestinians

Taken fron Haaretz, Israel July 30, 2007
By Akiva Eldar

Israel has recently agreed to allow a group of 41 Iraqi refugees of Palestinian origin to enter the West Bank and reunite with relatives there, as a goodwill gesture to the government of Palestinian Prime Minister Salam Fayad.

A request by another group of 10 refugees seeking to join their relatives in the Gaza Strip was, however, denied.

The Prime Minister's Bureau confirmed Sunday night that Israeli officials were in the process of completing the necessary measures, in coordination with the Foreign Ministry and the relevant defense authorities.

The Foreign Ministry clarified to the relevant parties involved, primarily the United Nations, that Israel does not consider granting entry to Iraqi refugees a precedent heralding the return of Palestinians to the territories - and certainly not to Israel.

After discussion with the UN, it was agreed that the Palestinian Iraqis, who will enter the West Bank, will not receive refugee status and will be registered as regular citizens of the Palestinian Authority.

Prior to being allowed into the West Bank, they will undergo a detailed security check to ensure that they are not involved in terrorist activities.

Most of the refugees had been living in a camp on the border of Syria and Iraq, but a few escaped to Jordan, along with 750,000 other Iraqis, following the United States' 2003 invasion. Another 1.5 million Iraqi refugees fled to Syria.

Thousands of other refugees were stranded on the border with Syria after it was closed, with Damascus claiming that it could not longer support the massive influx of civilians fleeing Iraq.

The refugees are being supported solely by the Red Cross in refugee camps along the borders of Syria and Jordan. Arab states have rejected repeated requests by the UN and the United States to absorb refugees.

Two and a half years ago, the representative of the UN High Commission on Refugees in Israel, Michael Bavli, asked the Foreign Ministry to allow refugees to enter the territories. The request was turned down on political and security-related grounds.

Eight months ago, Bavli reiterated the request, emphasizing that the UN recognizes that there is no connection between the entry of the refugees into the territories and politics.

Dr. Riad Malchi, who is now justice minister in the Palestinian Authority, and Jamal Zakut, a confidant of Salam Fayad, raised the problem of the refugees at a meeting held between Israelis and Palestinians in Italy last April, under the auspices of an Italian peace institute.

The two Palestinian representatives to the talks suggested that Israel should allow refugees to reunite with their families in the territories, a practice that came to a halt since the start of the second intifada in September 2000.

MK Amira Dotan (Kadima), who participated in the meeting in Italy, passed on the request to the Prime Minister's Bureau and to Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni. The decision to agree to the request came following the collapse of the Palestinian unity government under Ismail Haniyeh, and because of Israel's efforts to bolster the standing of PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas.

The 30,000-strong Palestinian community in Iraq suffered a great deal in the years that followed the fall of Saddam Hussein, at the hands of Shi'ite militants who consider them to be strong supporters of the former Iraqi dictator.

The vast majority of the Palestinians living in Iraq are originally from villages in the foothills of the Carmel Mountains of Haifa. In 1948, Iraqi officers stationed in the northern West Bank forcibly conscripted men from those villages, and then allowed them and their families to enter Iraq - but never offered them citizenship.

----------------------------------------------------------
What right does the state of Israel have to dictate who can live in a state that does not belong to them? This is such a big joke - unfortunately it is sad and true. There are many Palestinians living in neighbouring Arab countries and around the world that are refused entry into Palestine or even to their homes in what is now Israel, As someone wrote in a talkback on the Jerusalem Post " Why should European, Ashkenazy Jews have the right to return to a country that they have no ancestry to, but the Palestinians who have lived on the land for thousands of years are barred by opportunist incomers from Europe and America?". Shouldn't these Iraqi Palestinians be given shelter in Haifa? With regards to Iraqi refugees in general, it should be the responsibility of those who instigated the illegal war with Iraq to take these refugees to their countries - I'm talking about the UK and USA. Yes, the USA has only recently been accepting refugees from Iraq and placing them in Detroit, but it is not as much as say little Sweden who have accepted more than 7,200.

The Office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees recently said that about 2 million Iraqis have been displaced inside the country so far, and that an estimated 2.2 million others have fled to Syria, Jordan and other neighbors. Each month, an additional 60,000 Iraqis flee their homes. The White House in February said it would accept up to 7,000 Iraqis to move to the United States by September - the truth is only 1,500 of them have been interviewed, and about 1,000 "conditionally approved" pending security checks and travel arrangements. Here are some facts: Since 2003, the year of the U.S. invasion, the United States has admitted 825 Iraqi refugees, many of them backlogged applicants from the time when Saddam Hussein was in power. By comparison, the United States has accepted 3,498 Iranians in the past nine months.

Evangelicals' Letter Backs PA State

Taken from The Jerusalem Post, Jul. 29, 200
By JPOST.COM STAFF AND ETGAR LEFKOVITS


Many evangelical Christians throughout the United States support a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and seek "justice" for both sides, reads an open letter to US President George W. Bush published in Sunday's New York Times.

The letter, signed by several dozen evangelical clergy and activists, urged the Bush administration not to "grow weary" in its attempt to negotiate a "lasting peace" in the region.

The letter's authors sought to correct what they called a "serious misperception" that all American evangelicals objected to the establishment of a Palestinian state, and said they hoped that the awareness of a large body of evangelical support for a permanent status agreement between Israel and the PA would "embolden" Bush.

Those who love [Israel] are not forced to withhold criticism, the letter argued, adding that "genuine love and blessing" meant promoting one's neighbors well-being.

According to the letter's authors, both Israel and the Palestinians had rights to the land of Israel that stretched back "millennia." Both sides, the letter said, had committed acts of violence.

Only a lasting peace agreement, the letter exhorted, would end bloodshed and ensure that each side had a "viable" state. To this end, the letter's authors expressed their support for the road map peace plan, and endorsed former British prime minister Tony Blair's efforts in his new role as the Quartet's Middle East envoy.

"We renew our prayers and support for your leadership... and justice and peace for all the people in the Holy Land," the letter concluded.

But other senior evangelical Christian leaders in the US blasted the letter as misrepresenting mainstream evangelical beliefs.

"The authors of this letter do not represent the views of the vast majority of Bible-believing mainstream evangelicals in America," said San Antonio-based Pastor John C. Hagee, a prominent Israel supporter.

"The problem in the Middle East is that Israel has no partner for peace, and Israel's neighbors refuse to recognize Israel's right to exist," Hagee said.

He added that the assertion by letter's writers that the Palestinians have a historic connection to the Holy Land is "absolutely incorrect."

Hagee's organization "Christians United for Israel" which has been dubbed the Christian AIPAC and which held its second-annual Washington summit last week with 4,500 delegates from across the US, is planning on sending US President George W. Bush its own letter voicing their opposition to American pressure on Israel for any further land withdrawals.

A list of the letter's signatories:

Ronald J. Sider, President
Evangelicals for Social Action

Don Argue, President
Northwest University

Raymond J. Bakke, Chancellor
Bakke Graduate University

Gary M. Benedict, President
The Christian & Missionary Alliance

George K. Brushaber, President
Bethel University

Gary M. Burge, Professor
Wheaton College & Graduate School

Tony Campolo, President/Founder
Evangelical Association for the Promotion of Education

Christopher J. Doyle, CEO
American Leprosy Mission

Leighton Ford, President
Leighton Ford Ministries

Daniel Grothe, Pastoral Staff
New Life Church (Colorado Springs)

Vernon Grounds, Chancellor
Denver Seminary

Stephen Hayner, former President
InterVarsity Christian Fellowship

Joel Hunter, Senior Pastor
Northland Church
Member, Executive Committee of the NAE

Jo Anne Lyon, Founder/CEO
World Hope International

Gordon MacDonald, Chair of the Board
World Relief

Albert G. Miller, Professor
Oberlin College

Richard Mouw, President
Fuller Theological Seminary

David Neff, Editor
Christianity Today

Glenn R. Palmberg, President
Evangelical Covenant Church

Earl Palmer, Senior Pastor
University Presbyterian Church Seattle

Victor D. Pentz, Pastor
Peachtree Presbyterian Church, Atlanta

John Perkins, President
John M. Perkins Foundation for Reconciliation & Development

Bob Roberts, Jr., Senior Pastor
Northwood Church, Dallas

Leonard Rogers, Executive Director
Evangelicals for Middle East Understanding

Andrew Ryskamp, Executive Director
Christian Reformed World Relief Committee

Chris Seiple, President
Institute for Global Engagement

Robert A. Seiple, Former Ambassador-at-Large,
International Religious Freedom
U.S. State Department

Luci N. Shaw, Author, Lecturer
Regent College, Vancouver

Jim Skillen, Executive Director
Center for Public Justice

Glen Harold Stassen, Professor
Fuller Theological Seminary

Richard Stearns, President
World Vision

Clyde D. Taylor, Former Chair of the Board
World Relief

Harold Vogelaar, Director
Center of Christian-Muslim Engagement for Peace and Justice

Berten Waggoner, National Director
Vineyard USA

-----------------------------------------------------------
It's people like paster Hagee that really make me sick, It's people like him that prevent a resolution to the peace process by making threatening sound bites and dividing the people of the Middle East.